Both are enterprise-tier. Oxylabs has cleaner pricing and arguably better customer support. BrightData has a larger IP pool and more advanced tooling. At the Corporate/volume tier, pricing converges ($2.50/GB for both). Choose Oxylabs for simplicity and support; choose BrightData for maximum IP diversity and tool ecosystem.
Best budget pick: Oxylabs | Best for enterprise: BrightData
In pure pricing terms, Oxylabs wins on the best public $/GB while Oxylabs is easier to start with from a cash-commitment perspective. That distinction matters because many buyers overweight the best unit price and underweight how painful the first purchase actually is.
| Plan | $/mo | $/GB |
|---|---|---|
| Starter | $30.00/mo | $6.00/GB |
| Basic | $100.00/mo | $5.00/GB |
| Advanced | $500.00/mo | $4.00/GB |
| Corporate Best value | $2500.00/mo | $2.50/GB |
| Plan | $/mo | $/GB |
|---|---|---|
| Pay As You Go | $0.00/mo | $4.00/GB |
| Starter | $499.00/mo | $3.50/GB |
| Advanced | $999.00/mo | $3.00/GB |
| Enterprise Best value | $1999.00/mo | $2.50/GB |
Oxylabs vs Bright Data for Residential Proxies in 2026
Neither is clearly better overall. Oxylabs has the bigger IP pool, faster speeds, and better raw performance. Bright Data is easier to use and has more features built in.
Head-to-Head Comparison
| Category | Oxylabs | Bright Data |
|----------|---------|------------|
| IP Pool | 100M+ residential IPs across 195 countries (mostly US and Germany), ethically sourced through Honeygain | 72M+ residential IPs; stronger mobile (7M+) and ISP (700K+) options |
| Speed & Reliability | Faster connections (0.5-1s average, 2x faster on mobile); 97-99% success rate | 99.9-99.99% success rate; comparable speed but slower on mobile |
| Ease of Use | Steeper learning curve—requires technical setup (self-build gateway, separate APIs). Limited dashboard | Beginner-friendly with self-service dashboard, Proxy Manager, SOCKS5, all-in-one APIs, and customizable Zones |
| Pricing | $8.4/GB pay-as-you-go; better for high-volume users | Similar rates; good for flexible, smaller-scale usage |
The Bottom Line
Choose Oxylabs if you need maximum scale, speed, and performance. Choose Bright Data if you want an easier setup and more built-in tools.
Oxylabs vs Bright Data for Web Scraping
Oxylabs is the more reliable choice for enterprise web scraping. It has higher user satisfaction ratings, more dependable proxies with fewer failures, and better performance when rotating IPs and managing IP quality.[1][2][4]
Why Oxylabs Wins on Reliability
User Reviews: G2 users consistently rate Oxylabs higher than Bright Data, citing reliable proxies, solid infrastructure, and an easy-to-use interface. Crozdesk scores also favor Oxylabs at 90% versus Bright Data's 89%.[8]
Proxy Performance: Oxylabs is faster at proxy rotation, delivers better IP quality, and has fewer failures—all critical for scraping at scale. Proxyway confirms Oxylabs matches or beats Bright Data on speed and pool size while costing less.[2]
Simpler to Use: Oxylabs has a straightforward dashboard and APIs organized by service type. Users find it easier to integrate into code compared to Bright Data's unified but more complex system.[1][2]
What Bright Data Does Better
Bright Data offers more customization options, a larger proxy pool (72+ million residential IPs), a Web Scraper IDE, pre-built APIs, datasets, and market intelligence tools.[2][3][5][4] It lets you pay-as-you-go across most services, which works well for enterprises that need hands-on control. The downside: it's more complicated and doesn't rate as high on user satisfaction or proxy reliability.[1]
Pricing for Residential Proxies (per GB)
| Volume | Oxylabs | Bright Data |
|--------|---------|-------------|
| 1 GB | $8 | $8.40 |
| 5 GB | $40 | $42 |
| 20 GB | $155 | $168 |
Start Free Trial — Oxylabs → Start Free Trial — BrightData →